NOTE: CASE RESULTS DEPEND ON A VARIETY OF UNIQUE FACTORS AND DO NOT GUARANTEE OR PREDICT SIMILAR RESULTS FOR FUTURE CASES.
FH+H Partners Milt Johns and Rich Gross, along the FH+H government contracts team, successfully defended two protests on behalf of a service-disabled, veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB) corporate client.
The client had been awarded a contract for government support services in excess of $100 million. Competitor companies then lodged protests of the contract award with the Small Business Administration (SBA) based on the client's small business status and SDVOSB status.
The FH+H government contracts team answered and opposed the protests, both of which were then dismissed by the SBA. Dismissal of these protests now clears the way for the client to begin performance under the contract.
The FH+H Government Contracts Team assisted a Women-Owned Small Business to maintain its certification after it was denied by a third party certifier. The team worked with the client to understand the certification issues, and drafted an appeal letter to the third party certifier. Within a few weeks the denial was overturned and the client was certified once again as a WOSB.
The U.S. Court of Federal Claims ruled that National Air Cargo Group Inc. (NAC) has standing to sue the U.S. Transportation Command over adding United Airlines Inc. as a sixth and final contractor in a pool of awardees (that already included NAC) for cargo transportation orders, rejecting an earlier U.S. Government Accountability Office decision denying standing to NAC. FH+H Government Contracts Practice Chair, Milt Johns, argued the matter for National Air Cargo Group Inc.
The Court rejected the government’s argument that because selection as part of the indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract to transport U.S. Department of Defense and other government cargo only guaranteed each member of the pool $2,500, the dispute was only for that amount, rather than a larger chunk of the $296 million deal. The government had also argued that, in these circumstances, a company that received an ID/IQ award could not protest another award.
The matter continues now for a decision on the full merits of the case.
FH+H Partner Milt Johns and Associate Marlena Ewald successfully negotiated a settlement which allowed the client to obtain the relief it requested, with no liability, prior to trial. The client, a local business, was the plaintiff in a suit in Prince William County, and the defendant had counterclaimed for breach of contract damages. The FH+H litigation team was able to settle the matter so that the plaintiff received all of the relief it had requested, and the counterclaim was dismissed with prejudice with no payment made to defendant.
FH+H Partner Craig Guthery successfully defended a software company in litigation involving an accusation by a former customer that FH+H’s client developed and delivered faulty and unfinished software. Through Craig’s efforts, the former customer non-suited (withdrew) his state court complaint and is no longer pursuing the action.
FH+H Partner Milt Johns and Associate Marlena Ewald worked with a client to expand its contracting capability by assisting with its certification as a Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB) and an Economically Disadvantaged Women-Owned Small Business (EDWOSB). The WOSB and EDWOSB programs allow women owned businesses which meet specific qualifications to compete for government contracts that are set-aside for certain industries where women are underrepresented. The FH+H team was able to evaluate the client’s current status and provided assistance in navigating the government contract realm.
Managing Partner Tom Craig and the FH+H litigation team successfully concluded arbitration on a breach of contract claim in a construction matter by negotiating a favorable settlement. FH+H’s client filed suit in arbitration pursuant to the parties’ agreement for outstanding payments and damages, while defendant counterclaimed and alleged that it was due more than it owed plaintiff. Together the claims were in the seven figures. Tom’s attention to detail, negotiating skills, and zealous representation of the client during arbitration compelled opposing counsel to increase its initial settlement offer by over 60%. In the end, the FH+H litigation team was able to obtain a substantial settlement for the client and a release of all liability related to the counterclaim.
FH+H partner Craig Guthery assisted a closely held corporate client to structure its internal documents for succession planning. The current ownership of a mid-sized corporation sought to create a structure that would allow the current owners to pass the value they had built in their company on to the next generation, while simultaneously providing for a smooth transition and continuous operation of the company. Managing partner Tom Craig assisted in drafting and structuring a shareholder agreement and related documents that allowed for the desired wealth transfer without disrupting the operation or control of the company.
FH+H Partner Milt Johns and Associate Marlena Ewald worked with a client to successfully obtain its Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) certification. The client, a government contractor, had applied and been denied DBE status by the Department of Small Business and Supplier Diversity (DSBSD). After a successful appeal to the U.S. Department of Transportation, the client was denied once again by the DSBSD on remand. FH+H submitted a reconsideration letter and packet to DSBSD which strongly advocated on the client’s behalf. Within a couple weeks of the submission, the client received notification from DSBSD that it had been granted its well-deserved DBE certification.
The FH+H Government Contracts Team, led by Partner Milt Johns, filed a bid protest with the Government Accountability Office (GAO) on behalf of a Department of Defense government contracts client. The client was a long standing incumbent on a large, multimillion dollar national security contract. During the proposal evaluation process for the re-compete of the contract, the client was notified by the agency that they were eliminated from the competitive range of offerors for the proposal. The FH+H Government Contracts Team filed a protest at the GAO on behalf of the client. Based on the filing, the Government agency took corrective action and rescinded the notification of elimination, returning the client to the competition.