NOTE: CASE RESULTS DEPEND ON A VARIETY OF UNIQUE FACTORS AND DO NOT GUARANTEE OR PREDICT SIMILAR RESULTS FOR FUTURE CASES.
FH+H Partner Kevin Byrnes successfully defended a federal employee facing a security clearance denial based on the employee allegedly failing to report prior alcohol-related incidents in their security questionnaire.
The employee did not report several prior alcohol-related incidents on their SF-86 Security Questionnaire. Mr. Byrnes helped the employee provide written and oral statements to explain that the employee thought the juvenile matters has been expunged and did not need to be reported.
The denial was overturned, and the employee was able to obtain the security clearance.
Read more FH+H client success stories here.
FH+H Partner Milt Johns intervened in a Government Accountability Office (GAO) protest on behalf of a client who was awarded a federal contract that was then challenged by a competitor.
Mr. Johns filed a motion to dismiss the protest, after which, the competitor voluntarily withdrew their protest.
The FH+H Government Contracts team, led by Mr. Johns, guides middle-market government contractors through the maze of applicable rules and regulations to enable corporate success, now and in the future.
Read more about FH+H's Government Contracts Practice Group here.
A retired Army Green Beret serving in the civil service faced job termination and loss of security clearance. FH+H Senior Counsel and former senior Army official Dean Popps initially shaped issues surrounding this time-sensitive matter for the client, allowing an efficient, timely, and cost-effective engagement with FH+H Partner Dave Jonas.
Mr. Jonas successfully negotiated a resignation rather than a termination, and the client’s security clearance remained intact.
Mr. Jonas’ performance on behalf of his client is indicative of FH+H’s depth and breadth in terms of dealing with the government’s legal, organizational, and bureaucratic structures, and how to work within that milieu to win for the client.
Mr. Jonas noted that the practice of employment law inside the beltway is unique, and FH+H practitioners may often provide a critical advantage to a client.
Read about Mr. Jonas' experience and legal practice here.
Partner Milt Johns and Counsel Jill Helwig of the FH+H Business Litigation team settled a dispute among owners in a close-hold business, where the FH+H-represented parties achieved all of their business goals.
The FH+H Business Litigation team handles all aspects of professional dispute resolution, including defending individuals and corporate entities against law suits in State and Federal courts across the nation, representing clients’ interests beyond final judgment and through the appeals process, and providing clients early advice to avoid litigation altogether.
Read more about the FH+H litigation team here.
The FH+H Litigation and Investigations team, led by Partner Craig Guthery, represented an out-of-state lawyer in an omnibus sanctions motion against plaintiff attorneys pending in federal court in Virginia. U.S. District Court Judge Claude Hilton denied the motion and imposed no sanctions against Mr. Guthery’s client.
The FH+H Litigation and Investigations team handles all aspects of professional dispute resolution, including defending individuals and corporate entities against lawsuits in State and Federal courts across the nation, representing clients’ interests beyond final judgment and through the appeals process, and providing clients early advice to avoid litigation altogether.
Read more about the team here.
On behalf of a small business client, Partner Milt Johns and Associate Rachel Leahey of the FH+H Government Contracts team settled an invoicing dispute with a government agency that resulted in a high six-figure payment to the client.
The FH+H Government Contracts team guides contractors through the maze of applicable rules and regulations to enable corporate success.
Read more about how the team can help clients here.
In a recent arbitration, FH+H Partner Kevin Byrnes prevailed on behalf of a private daycare against a construction company that failed to complete work under a service contract.
The daycare wanted to improve the quality of the school under a D.C. set-aside program that provided loans for just that purpose, but the contractor failed to complete the work in a timely fashion and left the worksite unclean.
The contractor said the daycare’s requirement that the company not work during facility hours caused the delay and denied that the workers failed to maintain the cleanliness of the worksite.
The daycare facility presented pictures and text messages to confirm that the contractor had lacked diligence in the set work schedule and had left the conditions of the facility unsafe for the children in attendance - who were as young as six months.
The arbitrator rejected the contractor’s defenses, awarding the daycare with damages to complete the project and handle cleaning fees and the costs of arbitration.
Counseled a government contractor during negotiations to close a $250 million direct commercial sales contract from a friendly foreign government.
Successfully defended a corporate client in complex contract litigation.
Helped a client obtain licensing and approval for exports of more than $50 million in controlled defense articles and services.
Assisted a government contractor with registering to do business and finalizing corporate structure for performance of a complex direct commercial sales contract in the Middle East.
Represented a senior executive in a dispute with corporate business co-owners.
FH+H Partner Milt Johns and Senior Associate Marlena Ewald worked with a client - a small, disadvantaged, service-disabled, veteran-owned business - to have a claim of unlawful discrimination dismissed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC).
A former employee of the client filed a complaint of unlawful workplace discrimination against the client. The FH+H team worked with the client to compile pertinent facts and draft the response to the complaint. The EEOC thereafter dismissed the complaint, finding no information upon which they could conclude a statute was violated.
FH+H's attorneys represent employers in all aspects of employment-related matters and have been successful in helping business entities of all sizes. For more information on our Employment Law Practice Group, click here.
FH+H Partner Jack White, the head of our employment practice, alongside members of the FH+H team, recently assisted the State Department in defeating the claims of a former State Department subcontractor.
FH+H had already successfully gotten its client out of the underlying employment litigation; however, the State Department had not been released from the underlying litigation. Because of the merits of this litigation, FH+H, alongside its client, assisted the Department of State in providing information that resulted in the withdrawal of the surviving claims against the State Department.
FH+H continues to serve the needs of its clients and the government in every way possible.